USCIRF Suggests to Blacklist India on Religious Freedom

For the second year in a row, a US commission, USCIRF, suggested that India be included on a religious freedom blacklist. The commission claimed that the treatment of minorities had worsened.

Last year, the Indian government reacted furiously to the US Commission on International Religious Freedom\’s call. However, there\’s no hope the State Department will follow its advice and condemn India.

The Dire Situation in India

In its annual report, the commission stated that “religious freedom conditions in India continued their downward trend”. However, the commission only gives recommendations and doesn\’t make policies.

The report went on to say that Prime Minister Narendra Modi\’s government \”promoted Hindu nationalist policies. This has resulted in systemic, continuing and egregious religious freedom violations.\”

It cited reports of police involvement in brutality against Muslims during deadly riots in New Delhi last year. It also highlighted the ongoing questions about a citizenship bill promoted by Modi. According to critics, the bill labels Muslims as non-Indians.

Moreover, it also claimed that the Indian government was suffocating dissent and expressed concern about the growth of interfaith marriage restrictions, especially in India\’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh.

In an apparent reference to the Tablighi Jamaat Markaz in March 2020, the USCIRF gave a statement. USCIRF stated that  “At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, disinformation and hateful rhetoric – including from government officials – often targeted religious minorities, continuing familiar patterns.”

India’s Ignorant Behaviour

Last year the USCIRF members were denied visas to visit India. The members wanted to visit for further assessment. International bodies like USCIRF, according to External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, do not have the locus standi to \”pronounce on the condition of Indian citizens\’ legally reserved rights.\”

List of Notable Names

The commission proposed that India is a \”country of special concern\” by the State Department. This is alongside China, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.

Eritrea, Iran, Myanmar, Nigeria, North Korea, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan are among the countries on the State Department\’s blacklist, which may lead to penalties if they do not reform their records.

Moore’s Lobbying

One commissioner, Johnnie Moore, a Trump appointee, expressed reservations about the recommendation on India. Moore said in a statement that India was \”at a fork in the fence,\” nonetheless, it is still the world\’s biggest democracy, with constitutional assurances of religious freedom.

He complained that India should not be a \’country of special interest\’ among all the countries in the world. He went on to say that it personifies plurality and that its religious life has become its greatest historical blessing.

Lastly, in addition to India, the commission has requested the State Department to also include Russia, Syria and Vietnam in the blacklist.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »