Nepal to Limit the Total Number of Climbers for Mount Everest

Nepal has implemented a quota scheme that limits the number of climbers allowed to attempt Everest in a desperate attempt to avoid overcrowding on the world\’s highest peak as the country prepares for a record number of climbers this season, which begins in May.

No Crowd Allowed

The Department of Tourism issued a memorandum on Wednesday for a limited number of mountaineers, chosen based on their climbing permit numbers, to attempt the summit within the first \”weather window\” that opens after the ropes and ladders are fixed up to the roof.

A certain number of people will be able to attempt the summit within the second weather window, or during a time of good weather when climbing is safe, and so on.

If this scheme fails, the adventure outfitters will have to arrange and organize the climbing among themselves, with a maximum of 170 people in one weather window, according to the Department of Tourism.

History and the COVID

According to Guinness World Records, the most people to cross the summit of Everest in a single day is 354, with 212 climbers from Nepal, according to a recordset on May 23, 2019. Similarly, on May 19, 2013, 266 people reached the summit of Everest.

The government granted 381 Everest climbing permits in 2019. It was a record number, causing “traffic jams” on the snowy path to the summit. On the Nepalese side, ten people died, the highest death toll in four years.

The number of permits granted this year, in the middle of the second wave of Covid-19, is high. Authorities predict that this will set a new limit. The department had given climbing permits to 377 people as of Wednesday.

“Based on the current trend, we estimate the number of permits to be close to 400,” said Mira Acharya, director of the Department of Tourism.

Everest could see a throng of over 800 people crawling up its slopes this year. Inevitably creating fears of yet another record crowd on the planet\’s highest stage.

Opinions of Top Officials

The new guidelines sound fine on paper, and expeditions must follow the government\’s decision. Although, they aren\’t \”practically implementable,\” according to Dambar Parajuli, president of the Expedition Operators Association.

According to Parajuli, in previous years, expedition organizers were also permitted to set the number of climbers. However, this is based on a common agreement.

As many climbers compete for the summit at the same time on Everest, a \”traffic jam\”-like scenario occurs. Consequently, when it occurs over 8,000 meters, the \”Death Zone,\” it can be very risky.

Due to the number of Climbers, a \’traffic jam\’ can potentially occur. As a result, they have to wait for their turn to ascend or descent on a single cable. This in return raises the risk of fatigue, frostbite, or altitude sickness.

Climbers can also run out of oxygen during the ascent\’s final stages. In the wake of the Covid-19 threat, a climber is not permitted to attempt another mountain directly after completing the first ascent. This is according to the most recent directive.

Until going on another climb, a climber must apply a negative polymerase chain reaction test result, according to the guideline.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign examines how indirect US funding and a $7 billion abandoned arsenal have turned the Taliban into a regional force multiplier for militant groups.

Read More »
The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militancy signals a shift in doctrine, but rising regional attacks and ideological fractures raise questions about its enforceability.

Doctrine vs Reality: Can the Taliban Enforce Their Ban on Foreign Militants?

The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militants has been hailed by officials in Kabul as a decisive theological shift. But rising attacks in the north, continued TTP operations, and mounting pressure from Washington expose a widening gap between doctrine and reality. As regional powers demand proof of enforcement, the decree risks becoming another symbolic gesture unless it translates into measurable action on the ground.

Read More »
Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

The Pakistan-Afghanistan trade freeze is widely framed as a punitive economic move, yet its roots lie in a severe security breakdown emanating from Afghan territory. Pakistan’s transit closures are reactive, not aggressive, and Afghanistan’s deep logistical dependence on Pakistani routes exposes the crisis as geopolitical, not commercial.

Read More »
Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

India is witnessing a steady erosion of democratic freedoms as broad security laws, digital surveillance, and administrative restrictions redefine dissent as a threat rather than a constitutional right. From expanded use of UAPA and IT Rules to routine protest crackdowns and shrinking academic space, the cumulative impact is a quieter and increasingly constrained civic sphere.

Read More »
The Taliban’s Gamble with Afghan Healthcare

The Taliban’s Gamble with Afghan Healthcare

The Taliban’s ban on Pakistani pharmaceutical imports is pushing Afghanistan toward a severe drug shortage. Driven by ideological ties to the TTP and escalating border tensions with Pakistan, this political maneuver threatens public health, inflates medicine costs, and leaves ordinary Afghans to bear the consequences of a crisis rooted in strategic posturing rather than market forces or natural disaster.

Read More »