Nepal to Limit the Total Number of Climbers for Mount Everest

Nepal has implemented a quota scheme that limits the number of climbers allowed to attempt Everest in a desperate attempt to avoid overcrowding on the world\’s highest peak as the country prepares for a record number of climbers this season, which begins in May.

No Crowd Allowed

The Department of Tourism issued a memorandum on Wednesday for a limited number of mountaineers, chosen based on their climbing permit numbers, to attempt the summit within the first \”weather window\” that opens after the ropes and ladders are fixed up to the roof.

A certain number of people will be able to attempt the summit within the second weather window, or during a time of good weather when climbing is safe, and so on.

If this scheme fails, the adventure outfitters will have to arrange and organize the climbing among themselves, with a maximum of 170 people in one weather window, according to the Department of Tourism.

History and the COVID

According to Guinness World Records, the most people to cross the summit of Everest in a single day is 354, with 212 climbers from Nepal, according to a recordset on May 23, 2019. Similarly, on May 19, 2013, 266 people reached the summit of Everest.

The government granted 381 Everest climbing permits in 2019. It was a record number, causing “traffic jams” on the snowy path to the summit. On the Nepalese side, ten people died, the highest death toll in four years.

The number of permits granted this year, in the middle of the second wave of Covid-19, is high. Authorities predict that this will set a new limit. The department had given climbing permits to 377 people as of Wednesday.

“Based on the current trend, we estimate the number of permits to be close to 400,” said Mira Acharya, director of the Department of Tourism.

Everest could see a throng of over 800 people crawling up its slopes this year. Inevitably creating fears of yet another record crowd on the planet\’s highest stage.

Opinions of Top Officials

The new guidelines sound fine on paper, and expeditions must follow the government\’s decision. Although, they aren\’t \”practically implementable,\” according to Dambar Parajuli, president of the Expedition Operators Association.

According to Parajuli, in previous years, expedition organizers were also permitted to set the number of climbers. However, this is based on a common agreement.

As many climbers compete for the summit at the same time on Everest, a \”traffic jam\”-like scenario occurs. Consequently, when it occurs over 8,000 meters, the \”Death Zone,\” it can be very risky.

Due to the number of Climbers, a \’traffic jam\’ can potentially occur. As a result, they have to wait for their turn to ascend or descent on a single cable. This in return raises the risk of fatigue, frostbite, or altitude sickness.

Climbers can also run out of oxygen during the ascent\’s final stages. In the wake of the Covid-19 threat, a climber is not permitted to attempt another mountain directly after completing the first ascent. This is according to the most recent directive.

Until going on another climb, a climber must apply a negative polymerase chain reaction test result, according to the guideline.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »