India\’s Home Minister\’s Speech \’Unacceptable\’ for Bangladesh

Amit Shah’s Blunt Statement:

Amit Shah, the Indian Home Minister, has sparked a huge diplomatic row with Bangladesh by labelling its residents as poor. Not only this, but he also accused them of illegally commuting to India in search of work. Dhaka claims that the Indian minister is jeopardizing bilateral relations by making \”factually inaccurate\” remarks regarding Bangladesh\’s economic condition.

In an interview with the Bengali daily Anand Bazar Patrika on Tuesday, Shah, who is often referred to as India\’s second most powerful figure after Prime Minister Modi, said that Bangladesh\’s poor were still crossing into India for work.

Shah said, “The poor (in Bangladesh) still go hungry and cross over the border… And they are not just staying in Bengal. They are in different states, reaching as far as Jammu and Kashmir. The BJP will stop this infiltration of Bangladeshis into India if we come to power in West Bengal\”. (West Bengal is a border state currently polling to elect its government)

Bangladesh\’s Reaction to India\’s Home Minister\’s Speech:

The Bengali population, especially the government’s officials, took this statement very seriously and reacted harshly. Two notable government officials reacting to this were Iqbal Chowdhury Adviser to Bengali PM Sheikh Hasina and Foreign Minister of Bangladesh A. K. Abdul Momen.

An adviser to Bangladesh\’s Prime Minister said that Amit Shah has \”harmed\” Bangladeshi pride by referring to Bangladeshis as \”bad\”. Amit Shah further claimed that they migrate to India because there aren\’t enough jobs in their own country.

He said, \”Such remarks damage bilateral ties between the two countries. Especially at a time when we are enjoying such warm relations. Mr Shah’s remarks have definitely hurt our sentiments”. He also said, “As the president of the (India’s governing) Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Shah should refrain from making statements that would impact the bonds between the people of our countries”.

Chowdhury took his anger to another level and warned Amit from making a statement regarding Bangladesh in Indian politics’ context. He also mentioned that India had the audacity to call Bengalis ‘hungry’, knowing that fact that India has a much worse ranking (94th) in Hunger Index than Bangladesh (75th). Adding that he mentioned Bangladesh of the past, it’s not the same under Sheikh Hasina.

Bengali Foreign Minister Momen\’s Reaction to India\’s Home Minister\’s Speech:

Second to react was Bengali Foreign Minister Momen, calling Amit’s statement ‘Unacceptable’. He said that Amit knowledge regarding Bangladesh is incomplete as no one dies of hunger in Bangladesh anymore, notably from Monga (seasonal poverty and hunger in northern districts of Bangladesh).

Shah\’s comments have elicited strong responses from the Bangladeshi government, as well as strong rebuttals in the media and angry responses on social media. A Bengali newspaper Dhaka Tribune mentioned in an article “Shah has a long history of making hateful, insulting remarks about Bangladesh. On and off, he insults Bangladeshis, going as far as describing them as termites”.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »
Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Afghanistan’s recent shift away from Pakistani pharmaceutical imports toward Indian suppliers marks a dangerous transformation of healthcare into a tool of geopolitical signaling. Framed as regulatory reform, this pivot reflects a broader biopolitical strategy in which access to medicine is subordinated to diplomatic recalibration, with profound ethical and humanitarian consequences for an already vulnerable population.

Read More »
The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

Despite consolidating internal control and boosting revenues, the Taliban remain structurally incompatible with the 2025 global Counter-Terrorism Financing regime, as sanctions, militant linkages, and gender persecution block financial reintegration.

Read More »