India\’s Home Minister\’s Speech \’Unacceptable\’ for Bangladesh

Amit Shah’s Blunt Statement:

Amit Shah, the Indian Home Minister, has sparked a huge diplomatic row with Bangladesh by labelling its residents as poor. Not only this, but he also accused them of illegally commuting to India in search of work. Dhaka claims that the Indian minister is jeopardizing bilateral relations by making \”factually inaccurate\” remarks regarding Bangladesh\’s economic condition.

In an interview with the Bengali daily Anand Bazar Patrika on Tuesday, Shah, who is often referred to as India\’s second most powerful figure after Prime Minister Modi, said that Bangladesh\’s poor were still crossing into India for work.

Shah said, “The poor (in Bangladesh) still go hungry and cross over the border… And they are not just staying in Bengal. They are in different states, reaching as far as Jammu and Kashmir. The BJP will stop this infiltration of Bangladeshis into India if we come to power in West Bengal\”. (West Bengal is a border state currently polling to elect its government)

Bangladesh\’s Reaction to India\’s Home Minister\’s Speech:

The Bengali population, especially the government’s officials, took this statement very seriously and reacted harshly. Two notable government officials reacting to this were Iqbal Chowdhury Adviser to Bengali PM Sheikh Hasina and Foreign Minister of Bangladesh A. K. Abdul Momen.

An adviser to Bangladesh\’s Prime Minister said that Amit Shah has \”harmed\” Bangladeshi pride by referring to Bangladeshis as \”bad\”. Amit Shah further claimed that they migrate to India because there aren\’t enough jobs in their own country.

He said, \”Such remarks damage bilateral ties between the two countries. Especially at a time when we are enjoying such warm relations. Mr Shah’s remarks have definitely hurt our sentiments”. He also said, “As the president of the (India’s governing) Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Shah should refrain from making statements that would impact the bonds between the people of our countries”.

Chowdhury took his anger to another level and warned Amit from making a statement regarding Bangladesh in Indian politics’ context. He also mentioned that India had the audacity to call Bengalis ‘hungry’, knowing that fact that India has a much worse ranking (94th) in Hunger Index than Bangladesh (75th). Adding that he mentioned Bangladesh of the past, it’s not the same under Sheikh Hasina.

Bengali Foreign Minister Momen\’s Reaction to India\’s Home Minister\’s Speech:

Second to react was Bengali Foreign Minister Momen, calling Amit’s statement ‘Unacceptable’. He said that Amit knowledge regarding Bangladesh is incomplete as no one dies of hunger in Bangladesh anymore, notably from Monga (seasonal poverty and hunger in northern districts of Bangladesh).

Shah\’s comments have elicited strong responses from the Bangladeshi government, as well as strong rebuttals in the media and angry responses on social media. A Bengali newspaper Dhaka Tribune mentioned in an article “Shah has a long history of making hateful, insulting remarks about Bangladesh. On and off, he insults Bangladeshis, going as far as describing them as termites”.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »