Bangladesh under fire for HR violations after row at a Juvenile Development Centers

The objective of juvenile development centres

According to the Ministry of Social Welfare, the JDCs take the responsibility of caring, protecting, providing food, housing, clothing, medical care, education, vocational training, and correctional and human development, and counselling to the committed children.

Moreover, these are done as per the provisions of The Child Act, 2013, the National Children Policy, and in accordance with the provisions of the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).

However, On August 13, three inmates were killed. A further 15 injured in the Jessore JDC due to torture by officials.

The Investigation

No rehabilitation activities are carried out in the centre. Similarly, officials appointed to such centres have to generally be more sensitive and humane as they are dealing with minors. A large majority of them do not possess adequate skills to deal with juvenile delinquency. There are huge irregularities in serving food, medicines, and other essentials.

Expert’s comment on the state of affairs

Associate Professor Dr Kamal Choudhury of Clinical Psychology at the Dhaka University said: “It is not clear that any plan exists at juvenile centres for helping juveniles develop.”

“Officials do not follow any method for improving a child. Besides, they allow wrongdoings to continue which helps the inmates to become more aggressive,” he told Dhaka Tribune.

“The government should monitor the juvenile centres properly and revise its operating procedures to avoid any further incidents,” he added.

What’s happening in the centres?

There are three JDCs in Bangladesh – National Juvenile Development Centre, Tongi, Gazipur (for 300 boys); National Juvenile Development Centre, Konabari, Gazipur (for 150 girls); and Juvenile Development Centre, Jessore (for 150 boys). In Gazipur JCD for boys, there were 941 inmates at a time, at one period.

Inmates had to shower and sleep together in congested rooms, leading to diseases. Medicines needed to be provided by their guardians as the infirmary did not have sufficient stock.

What is more?

Overpopulated, low on manpower, low-grade food, no medical facility, administrative weakness, and budget deficit are all factors taking their toll on the centres.

Brutal torture, murder cases, and irregularities are not new. Inadequate counselling and motivation along with bullying and torture by officials and other inmates have lead to suicides, and self-harm as protest, in these centres. There have also been cases of escape to avoid torture and clashes between inmates and officials.

Furthermore, after the triple murder case, guardians and rights activists have become more anxious. Moreover, many guardians are trying to contract with their children physically which the authorities are not permitting right now.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »