Pakistan Says Mediation efforts between Saudi and Iran Move Slowly

Hoping for mediation

Prime Minister Imran Khan released a statement on Monday. He said that Pakistan’s U.S. requested mediation efforts between Gulf rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran have been making slow progress.

Prompted by Washington, former cricket great Khan in October visited Tehran and Riyadh. Pakistan has been making efforts since then to facilitate talks between the KSA and Iran. After attacks on Gulf oil interests, which the United States blamed on Iran, relations have been icy between the two countries. Moreover, tensions have been rising between Riyadh and Tehran over myriad issues. One of these is the war in Yemen where the kingdom is battling the Houthi rebel movement.

Islamabad and Tehran’s bilateral relations

For years, ties between Iran and Pakistan have remained tense due to a deep mutual mistrust. Generally, Islamabad has tried to maintain close ties with both, Saudi Arabia and Iran, but has drifted away from Tehran in the past few years.

Both Islamabad and Tehran accuse each other of backing and facilitating separatist groups, active in the Baluchistan provinces and seek independence from both neighbours.

In March, President Rouhani demanded Pakistan act decisively against anti-Iranian terrorists. An attack in February attack killed 27 members of the elite Revolutionary Guard in Sistan-Baluchistan was claimed Jaish al-Adl (Army of Justice). Tehran claimed that the suicide bomber was a Pakistani, and says the banned outfit operates mostly out of Pakistan.

Iran is also angered by Pakistan\’s role in the Saudi-led military alliance that is operating against Shiite Houthi rebels in Yemen.

PM Imran Khan’s statement

“Our mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia has not stopped and we are making progress, but slowly,” PM Khan told Al Jazeera. The broadcaster released extracts from an interview which is set to be aired in full on Wednesday.

Prime Minister Imran Khan added, “We have done our best to avoid a military confrontation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and our efforts have succeeded,” Qatar-based Al Jazeera reported.

What is on the cards?

Shi’ite Muslim Iran has long been at odds with U.S. Gulf Sunni Arab ally Saudi Arabia. U.S.-Iranian frictions worsened when President Donald Trump’s administration withdrew in mid-2018 from an accord. The accord limited Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for easing sanctions.

Islamabad is stepping up efforts to defuse tensions between the Gulf neighbours. Pakistan can rightly fear that a possible US-backed war with Iran would spill over into Pakistan. This could also possibly unleash sectarian violence between the country\’s majority Sunni and minority Shiite populations. Moreover, it would spell out an economic disaster for a country with an already frail economy.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Is an Islamic NATO emerging? Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia explore a trilateral defense pact reshaping Middle East and South Asian security.

Toward an Islamic NATO?

In a rapidly fragmenting global order, Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia are exploring a trilateral defense arrangement that could redefine regional security architectures. Often dubbed an Islamic NATO, the proposed pact reflects a broader shift by middle powers toward strategic autonomy as US security guarantees wane. This convergence signals the merging of Middle Eastern and South Asian strategic theaters into a single geopolitical map.

Read More »
Examining how superpower dominance has eroded international law, turning the rules-based order into a tool of hegemony.

The Hegemon’s Gavel

International law was never truly independent. Once the guarantor of the system breaks the rules, the law becomes a tool for power, not principle.

Read More »
Durand Line shifts from frontier to hard border, reshaping jihadist networks, militancy, and Pakistan-Afghanistan’s security landscape.

Militancy, Borderization, and the Politics of a Frontier

The Durand Line’s transformation from a porous frontier to a fenced border is altering militant strategies, funding, and regional security. Jihadist networks like TTP and IS-K are adapting to these changes while local populations face social and economic pressures.

Read More »