Torkham Border Closure Enters 18th Day Amid Pak-Afghan Dispute

Torkham border closure enters 18th day, disrupting trade & livelihoods. Urgent Pak-Afghan dialogue needed to resolve tensions.

The closure of the Torkham border between Pakistan and Afghanistan has now entered its 18th consecutive day, disrupting trade and leaving thousands of people in financial distress. The key crossing point, which serves as a vital trade corridor between the two countries, remains shut due to an escalating dispute over construction in a contested area.

According to Pak-Afghan affairs analyst Naseeb Shah Shinwari, certain locations along the Torkham border remain disputed. He cites a senior official from a research organization in Islamabad who revealed that an informal agreement exists between the two governments, stipulating that any construction in these areas should be carried out through mutual consultation and consent. However, Afghanistan’s unilateral decision to build a controversial checkpoint in the disputed area has triggered tensions, leading to the border’s prolonged closure.

“The Torkham crossing is a crucial economic artery for both nations, with approximately $3 million in bilateral trade flowing through it daily,” Shinwari stated, quoting a customs official. “The continued shutdown is inflicting millions of dollars in financial losses on Pakistan’s already struggling economy.”

Also See: Torkham Tensions: Afghan Forces Withdraw Excavator After Jirga Intervention

Beyond the economic toll, the closure has severely impacted local communities reliant on cross-border movement for their livelihoods. Shahin, a laborer at Torkham, described the crisis, emphasizing that thousands—including daily wage workers, cart pullers, hotel employees, and transport operators—have been left jobless, pushing them into a dire financial situation.

Shinwari underscores that both countries must adhere to their existing understanding regarding disputed territories and refrain from unilateral actions that fuel instability. “Pakistan and Afghanistan must exercise restraint and engage in dialogue,” he urged. “If both nations resort to rigid postures, it will only deepen the crisis, harming their economies and regional stability.”

As the border remains closed, the urgency for diplomatic engagement grows. Analysts warn that failure to resolve the dispute could further strain already fragile Pak-Afghan relations, making an amicable settlement imperative.

Disclaimer: This article is for news reporting purposes only and reflects the analysis of Pak-Afghan affairs analyst Naseeb Shah Shinwari.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Narrative by Design: Al Jazeera’s Editorial Tilt on the Pakistan–TTP Conflict

Narrative by Design: Al Jazeera’s Editorial Tilt on the Pakistan–TTP Conflict

Al Jazeera’s reputation for alternative journalism contrasts sharply with its recent reporting on Pakistan’s conflict with the TTP and tensions with the Afghan Taliban. A close review shows consistent editorial choices that soften the Taliban’s image, reframe terrorist violence as resistance, and cast Pakistan’s counter-terrorism actions as aggression—ultimately reshaping the narrative in Kabul’s favour.

Read More »
Modern Platforms, Evolving Doctrine

Modern Platforms, Evolving Doctrine

The Gulf’s air-power evolution is increasingly shaped by the fusion of advanced platforms with modern doctrine and faster decision cycles. As regional forces adapt to complex threat environments, partners like Pakistan, whose operational experience spans multiple domains, are becoming part of the broader conversation on future air-power thinking.

Read More »
Economic Engagement or Ethical Dilemma? Canada-India Relations and the Nijjar Case

Economic Engagement or Ethical Dilemma? Canada-India Relations and the Nijjar Case

Canada’s renewed trade outreach to India comes at a moment of deep diplomatic strain. As Minister Maninder Sidhu seeks to revive economic cooperation, the unresolved assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, and allegations implicating senior Indian officials, cast a long shadow. The controversy raises critical questions about whether Ottawa can balance economic ambitions with justice, accountability, and the protection of Canadian sovereignty.

Read More »
Zohran Mamdani calls out Modi and Netanyahu as war criminals, linking Gujarat 2002 and Gaza, and demands global justice and accountability.

Zohran Mamdani Stands Up for Justice: Holding Modi and Netanyahu Accountable

Zohran Mamdani, a rising progressive voice in the U.S., has boldly equated Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with war crimes. Drawing on global principles like the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and ICC indictments, Mamdani challenges the immunity of influential leaders and advocates for accountability for mass atrocities in Gujarat (2002) and Gaza.

Read More »