Elon Musk and Zalmay Khalilzad Advocate for Closure of U.S.-Funded Media Outlets

Elon Musk, Zalmay Khalilzad call for shutting down VOA, RFE/RL, sparking debate on U.S. government-funded media. [Image via Pajhwok]

February 12, 2025 – Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and former U.S. diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad have jointly called for the shutdown of two prominent U.S.-funded media organizations: Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). Their criticism has ignited discussions about the role and funding of government-supported media in the United States.

Musk’s Critique

Musk labeled VOA and RFE/RL as “relics of the past,” questioning the necessity of government-funded media in the current era. He further stated, “It’s just radical left crazy people talking to themselves while torching $1B/year of US taxpayer money.”

Khalilzad’s Perspective

Khalilzad echoed Musk’s concerns, emphasizing that the content produced by these media outlets sometimes appears to be driven by activist narratives rather than journalistic integrity. He suggested that the U.S. should reassess whether such media services genuinely support American interests or if they are being misused to promote alternative agendas.

Background on VOA and RFE/RL

Voice of America, established in 1942, provides news and information in over 40 languages, reaching an estimated weekly audience of more than 326 million people worldwide. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, founded in 1949 and 1951 respectively, broadcasts in 27 languages to 23 countries, with a weekly audience exceeding 47 million. Both organizations operate under the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), a government agency responsible for overseeing all U.S. international broadcasting.

Also See: Banned Terrorists, Unbanned Voices? X Hosts BLA Propaganda Space

Implications of Potential Closure

The proposed closure of VOA and RFE/RL raises questions about the future of U.S. international broadcasting and its role in promoting democracy and free press globally. Supporters of these organizations argue that they serve as vital sources of independent news in regions with restricted press freedom. For instance, in Afghanistan, where media freedom has declined under the current regime, these platforms provide a critical voice for those without access to independent reporting.

The debate over government-funded media is not confined to the United States. In Pakistan, VOA has faced criticism for its reporting, with allegations of bias and interference in internal affairs. Such criticisms highlight the challenges faced by international broadcasters in maintaining credibility and neutrality.

Elon Musk and Zalmay Khalilzad’s call for the closure of VOA and RFE/RL has sparked a broader conversation about the role of government-funded media in the modern information landscape. As discussions continue, the future of these organizations remains uncertain, with potential implications for global media freedom and the dissemination of information.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Is an Islamic NATO emerging? Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia explore a trilateral defense pact reshaping Middle East and South Asian security.

Toward an Islamic NATO?

In a rapidly fragmenting global order, Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia are exploring a trilateral defense arrangement that could redefine regional security architectures. Often dubbed an Islamic NATO, the proposed pact reflects a broader shift by middle powers toward strategic autonomy as US security guarantees wane. This convergence signals the merging of Middle Eastern and South Asian strategic theaters into a single geopolitical map.

Read More »
Examining how superpower dominance has eroded international law, turning the rules-based order into a tool of hegemony.

The Hegemon’s Gavel

International law was never truly independent. Once the guarantor of the system breaks the rules, the law becomes a tool for power, not principle.

Read More »
Durand Line shifts from frontier to hard border, reshaping jihadist networks, militancy, and Pakistan-Afghanistan’s security landscape.

Militancy, Borderization, and the Politics of a Frontier

The Durand Line’s transformation from a porous frontier to a fenced border is altering militant strategies, funding, and regional security. Jihadist networks like TTP and IS-K are adapting to these changes while local populations face social and economic pressures.

Read More »