ICC Calls for Arrest of Taliban Leaders Over the Rights Violations of Women

ICC prosecutor seeks arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over crimes against Afghan women; a move to ensure accountability. [Image via Reuters]

The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor, Karim Khan, announced on Thursday that he has requested arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders in Afghanistan, accusing them of persecuting women and girls in the country.

The two individuals named in the request are Haibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban’s supreme spiritual leader, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, the group’s chief justice since 2021.

Khan’s office stated that investigators had found “reasonable grounds” to believe that Akhundzada and Haqqani bear criminal responsibility for the crime against humanity of gender-based persecution.

The statement by the ICC outlined that both Taliban leaders are implicated in the systemic persecution of Afghan women, girls, and those perceived as allies of women. This persecution has been ongoing since the Taliban seized control of Kabul on August 15, 2021, and continues today.

Since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021, the group has imposed severe restrictions on women’s rights, including bans on education, limitations on women’s ability to work, and severe restrictions on their freedom in daily life.

The group’s interpretation of Islamic Sharia law has been cited as the justification for these actions, though Khan stressed that such an interpretation cannot be used to justify human rights abuses.

In a statement, Khan emphasized that his office is committed to pursuing accountability for gender-based crimes as he condemned the ongoing persecution of Afghan women, girls, and the LGBTQI+ community, calling it “unprecedented” and “unconscionable.”

Khan’s move is part of the ICC’s broader investigation into potential war crimes in Afghanistan, which has spanned over a decade and initially focused on alleged crimes by the U.S. military.

This is the first time ICC prosecutors have sought arrest warrants in relation to the Taliban’s actions since the start of the investigation in 2007.

The request will now be reviewed by a three-judge panel at the ICC, although there is no set timeline for a ruling. Procedures typically take around three months.

The request was welcomed by human rights organizations and advocates for Afghan women’s rights. However, some analysts suggested that even if the warrants are issued, the practical impact on Akhundzada may be limited, as he rarely leaves Afghanistan.

Zalmai Nishat, founder of the UK-based charity Mosaic Afghanistan, noted that the move would, however, severely damage the Taliban’s international standing, should the warrants be issued.

While this is a significant step for the ICC, the court is facing its own challenges.

Also See: Warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant: Justice, Politics, or Selective Action?

Recent high-profile arrest warrants, such as the one issued for Russian President Vladimir Putin and the impending sanctions from the U.S. for issuing a warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have heightened tensions.

The ICC relies on its 125 member states to enforce arrest warrants, but some nations, like Italy, have expressed reluctance to cooperate with such requests, raising questions about the court’s effectiveness in holding individuals accountable.

The ICC’s action comes amid growing concern over the treatment of Afghan women and girls, with the international community watching closely to see whether the court’s move will lead to tangible results.

The outcome of the request for arrest warrants could further define the legitimacy and power of the ICC in holding accountable those responsible for gender-based atrocities.

This news is sourced from The Express Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »