14 Naxalites Killed in Chhattisgarh Encounter, Including ₹1 Crore Bounty Leader

Chhattisgarh police killed 14 Naxalites, including a leader with ₹1 crore bounty, raising concerns over state violence and authoritarianism. [Image via South China Morning Post]

At least 14 Naxalites were killed in an encounter with Chhattisgarh police near the Chhattisgarh-Odisha border on January 21, 2025. Among those killed was a high-profile Naxalite leader, who had a bounty of ₹1 crore on his head. The clash, which occurred early in the morning, involved a Border Security Force (BSF) road-opening party.

The police reported that the operation is still ongoing, and more details are awaited. This significant success is being hailed by Indian security forces, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah stating on social media that “Naxalism is breathing its last today.” Shah’s statement highlighted the joint efforts of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Special Operations Group (SoG) Odisha, and Chhattisgarh Police in neutralizing the Naxalite threat.

This operation comes after a series of violent incidents in the region, including the injury of two BSF jawans on January 17 when Naxalites triggered an improvised explosive device (IED) in Narayanpur district.

Also See: Amit Shah’s Vision for India’s Anti-Naxal Operations: A Divided Legacy

Naxalism and the Growing Concern of Authoritarianism

While the Chhattisgarh police’s success in the encounter is seen as a blow to Naxalism, it raises deeper questions about the nature of state violence in India. Critics argue that such incidents reflect a broader trend of increasing authoritarianism in the country, where dissent, particularly from marginalized communities, is often met with forceful repression.

A growing number of voices believe that the Indian government’s response to insurgency and dissent, particularly within tribal regions, exemplifies a pattern of brutality aimed at stifling opposition. As security forces continue their operations in the region, including the neutralization of Naxalite figures, there are concerns that the government’s strategy disproportionately targets vulnerable minorities and activists critical of state policies.

From the North East to Kashmir, there are increasing reports of government policies undermining democratic freedoms, often under the guise of national security.

Also, the government’s handling of the Naxalite insurgency also raises alarms about India’s commitment to democracy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) frequently emphasize the importance of democracy and national unity, yet their actions tell a different story—one where state violence is justified to curb dissent and maintain control.

Many human rights organizations have expressed concern that the ongoing suppression of Naxalites, often resulting in civilian casualties, is a direct attack on the fundamental rights of minorities and marginalized communities. The Naxalites, originally a revolutionary force advocating for the rights of tribals and rural populations, have become a symbol of resistance against perceived oppression. In the eyes of some, the government’s actions are not only about combating insurgency but about stifling any form of opposition.

As India presses forward in its war against insurgency, the world must not ignore the rising oppression under the guise of security. The crackdown on Naxalites may be celebrated by some, but the ongoing human rights abuses in the country demand global scrutiny. For many, the question remains whether India’s commitment to democracy can withstand the growing authoritarianism that defines its internal security strategies.

The situation underscores the importance of recognizing the broader implications of such state actions, as they have the potential to shape India’s future political landscape in ways that challenge the very tenets of democratic governance.

This news is sourced from Live Mint and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Between Security and Privacy: Contextualizing Amnesty’s Claims on Pakistan’s Surveillance

Between Security and Privacy: Contextualizing Amnesty’s Claims on Pakistan’s Surveillance

Amnesty International’s Shadows of Control paints a bleak picture of Pakistan’s digital surveillance. Yet by sidelining the country’s acute security challenges, dismissing existing legal safeguards, and overlooking its own credibility issues, the report offers a partial and misleading narrative. A more balanced approach requires situating surveillance within Pakistan’s counterterrorism imperatives and recognizing the global double standards at play.

Read More »
The End of Liberal Internationalism? America’s Retreat into Realism

The End of Liberal Internationalism? Trump’s New Realism

Donald Trump’s address to the UN General Assembly marked a sharp break from America’s seven-decade stewardship of the liberal international order. Rooted in realist principles, his speech rejected multilateralism, attacked the UN’s legitimacy, and reframed alliances as transactional bargains. From immigration and climate policy to NATO and Middle East conflicts, Trump outlined a vision of unilateral power and national sovereignty that directly challenges the institutional foundations of global governance.

Read More »
Colonial Legacies of Bombay and Calcutta

Colonial Legacies of Bombay and Calcutta

Bombay and Calcutta were more than colonial capitals, they embodied imperial urban planning, economic integration, and cultural hybridity. From segregated ‘white’ and ‘black’ towns to thriving ports, industries, and nationalist thought, these cities reveal how British rule reshaped India’s urban life while leaving enduring legacies still visible today.

Read More »