12-Year-Old in Connecticut Faces Hate Crime Charges for Attacking Muslim Students

12-year-old in Waterbury, Connecticut, charged with hate crime for assaulting Muslim students, sparking Islamophobia concerns. [Image via Pexels]

A 12-year-old student in Waterbury, Connecticut, is facing a hate crime charge after allegedly assaulting two Muslim students at a middle school, authorities have confirmed.

The girl, whose identity has not been disclosed due to her age, was issued a juvenile court summons on charges of intimidation based on bigotry and bias in both the first and second degrees.

According to a joint statement from the Waterbury State’s Attorney’s Office, local police, and city officials, the attack was motivated by the victims’ religion and ethnicity, meeting the legal threshold for a hate crime.

The victims—twin 13-year-old girls—reported being punched, kicked, and having their hijabs forcibly removed in the school’s locker room during a gym period. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) says one of the girls suffered facial bruising, while the other sustained an abrasion on her neck after feeling something slide across it.

Their father took them to the hospital, where doctors documented bruises and scrapes on their faces, noses, and necks.

The incident, which occurred during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, has reignited concerns about rising Islamophobia in the United States.

While Waterbury Mayor Paul Pernerewski described the attack as an isolated incident, CAIR contends that the twins had repeatedly faced harassment over their religion and ethnicity.

In the weeks leading up to the attack, students had allegedly mocked the girls by using terms such as “Arab,” “Muslim,” and “Hijab” while making derogatory gestures. Just days before the assault, the same student now charged in the case reportedly made a threatening gesture by dragging her finger across her neck, CAIR said in a letter to city officials.

One additional student involved in the locker room attack has been referred to a youth diversionary programme instead of facing formal charges.

Also See: International Islamophobia Day 2025: UN, Activists Warn of Rising Anti-Muslim Hate

School and police response

Waterbury Public Schools Interim Superintendent Darren Schwartz acknowledged the attack, calling it “an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to ensuring students are safe and respectful of one another.”

Authorities say police initially investigated the March 3 incident as a disturbance or assault, but later reclassified it as a hate crime after the family provided further details.

Waterbury Police Chief Fernando Spagnolo stated: “Every student deserves to feel secure and respected in their learning environment, and we will continue to work closely with our school partners to uphold that standard.”

CAIR has urged officials to take stronger action to prevent religiously motivated violence in schools. Meanwhile, reports of Islamophobia in the US have reached record levels, with CAIR receiving 8,658 complaints of anti-Muslim bias last year—the highest ever recorded.

This news is sourced from The Express Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »