Zawahiri is Gone, But Not the Terrorism

On August 01, 2022, President Biden of the United States announced the killing of Al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri in a drone strike. POTUS went further remarking, “Now justice has been delivered, and this terrorist leader is no more.” We are witnessing quite an uproar in the media about the drone strike and its fruitful results. However, the fact that we should realize is that this event might end Al-Qaeda, but not terrorism.

Post-Zawahiri: Will Terrorism End?

This strike is a major setback for Al-Qaeda, which has devoted the last year to rebuild its operations in Afghanistan following the chaotic US pullout. The killing of Zawahiri has certainly created a leadership gap in Al-Qaeda, and this gap might annihilate the terror group into multiple factions.  It is for sure that Zawahiri hasn’t been as enchanting as Osama bin Laden or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Zawahiri’s death is a cause for celebration, but it also raises key concerns regarding the future of counterterrorism.

To begin with, the presence of Zawahiri in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of US troops indicates that the Taliban are once again providing a safe haven to the leaders of Al-Qaeda— an organization with which it has never broken. As long as the Taliban permits, Zawahiri can only live in such a safe house in Kabul\’s central business district.

If Sunday’s accomplishment can be emulated against other terrorist targets, we do not yet know how effective it will be elsewhere. Almost one year had passed since the last US drone strike in Afghanistan. It remains to be seen if President Biden’s administration is capable or willing to dismantle terror groups in Afghanistan systematically. We should resist the temptation to view the strike as a justification of “beyond the horizon” counterterrorism until the facts unfold themselves.

Saif al-Adel: Al-Qaeda’s Iran Factor 

Saif al-Adel, Al-Qaeda’s second in command, followed by Zawahiri in rank, has long been an Iranian regime guest. Since then, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Al-Qaeda have joined forces to combat common foes. If Saif does indeed rise to the top of Al-Qaeda, the US will need to pay particular attention to how their relationship develops.

Al-Qaeda After Zawahiri

Besides the above three reasons, some other facts and dynamics may sound harsh but are true.

First of all, in recent years, Al-Qaeda has receded its operational capabilities. It has now become more of an ideological group mentoring numerous terror outfits across the sub-continent (AQIS), Africa (Al-Shabaab and AQIM), and the Middle Eastern peninsula (Al-Nusra Front and AQAP). These groups have metastasized the terror threats and operational capabilities, finding their ideological roots connected with Al-Qaeda.

Even though Al-Qaeda has been displaced as the leading global jihadist group owing to the rise of the Islamic State, there are still five groups operating in various parts of the world, including Yemen, Africa, and South Asia that identify themselves as franchisees of Al-Qaeda and are capable of carrying out attacks against US or Western interests in their respective regions.

Zawahiri’s death is likely to mark the beginning of a new and potentially final chapter in al-Qaeda’s history, which began in Afghanistan in the late 1980s. However, his death does not lessen the broader threat posed by Al-Qaeda-affiliated groups operating outside of the United States.

Secondly, the killing of Zawahiri in Kabul should worry us about the safe havens provided by the Taliban regime to Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. Take the example of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Pakistan is highly critical of TTP’s sanctuaries across Eastern Afghanistan and has been negotiating simultaneously with the Afghan Taliban as well as TTP to draw a peace deal. Furthermore, the State Department has already issued a statement condemning the Taliban’s ‘gross’ violation of the Doha Agreement.

Thirdly, Islamic State’s affiliate ISKP/ISIS-K is continuously expanding across Central Asia and South Asia. This may lead to the confrontation of jihadist groups clinging to contending Islamic ideologies, which might result in a widespread spillover of terrorism, anarchy, and civil unrest, hence, worsening global security.

It would be premature to make any judgment yet about the outcomes of the strike, the Taliban’s perfidy, and the future of Al-Qaeda. We should not believe that Zawahiri’s death will halt terrorism. The safeguards should not be relaxed, otherwise, this bittersweet victory will turn completely bitter. It would not be inappropriate to quote Sun Tzu, as follow: “The wheels of justice grind slow, but grind fine.”

The article is originally published by GVS. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Muhammad Saad

Muhammad Saad is an ardent reader, writer, and researcher, keen to explore international relations, political science, and regional affairs.

Recent

The End of Dollar Dominance: How Gold is Rewriting the Rules of Global Finance

The End of Dollar Dominance: How Gold is Rewriting the Rules of Global Finance

After nearly eight decades of U.S. dollar supremacy, the global financial order is entering a historic transition. As nations seek refuge from debt crises, sanctions, and monetary manipulation, gold is regaining its status as the world’s most trusted store of value. Led by China’s strategic accumulation and supported by a worldwide shift toward de-dollarisation, this transformation signals the birth of a multipolar, asset-backed financial era, one anchored not in promises, but in tangible wealth.

Read More »
The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

Since the Taliban’s return to power, Afghanistan has once again become a hub for militant activity despite their promises under the 2020 Doha Accord. UN and SIGAR reports reveal that Afghan soil now shelters TTP, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS-K operatives involved in cross-border attacks, particularly against Pakistan. The Taliban’s failure to uphold intra-Afghan dialogue, misuse of international aid, human rights abuses, and deception in regional agreements have eroded trust globally. With terror networks thriving under their protection, it is time for the U.S. and international community to adopt a new, accountable strategy toward Afghanistan’s Taliban regime.

Read More »
Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

The escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban-led regime have reignited South Asia’s most volatile frontier. As cross-border attacks intensify and the Taliban refuses to dismantle the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamabad faces mounting security and sovereignty challenges. Yet, amid this chaos, India emerges as the silent beneficiary, leveraging regional instability to weaken Pakistan strategically while maintaining its image as a victim of terrorism. This calculated exploitation threatens to entrench South Asia in a new cycle of proxy conflict.

Read More »
Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban break commitments, harbor terrorists, exclude women and minorities, and defy international agreements.

Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable

Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.

Read More »
The Istanbul dialogue between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban collapsed over the TTP issue, exposing the limits of regional diplomacy and mediation.

The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy

The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.

Read More »