Poland and Baltic States to Dump Landmines Treaty Citing Russian Threat

Poland and Baltics to exit Ottawa Treaty, citing Russia threat, allowing use of landmines despite global disarmament concerns. [Image via Reuters/File]

NATO members Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia plan to withdraw from the Ottawa treaty banning anti-personnel landmines due to the military threat from their neighbour Russia, the four countries said on Tuesday.

Quitting the 1997 treaty, which has been ratified or acceded to by more than 160 nations, will allow Poland and the three Baltic countries to start stockpiling and using landmines again.

“Military threats to NATO member states bordering Russia and Belarus have significantly increased,” the countries’ defence ministers said in a joint statement.

“With this decision we are sending a clear message: our countries are prepared and can use every necessary measure to defend our security needs.”

All four countries share borders with Russia. Poland, Lithuania and Latvia also share borders with Moscow’s ally Belarus.

The announcement comes as Ukraine and Russia may be on the brink of agreeing a 30-day ceasefire and may move towards a more permanent end to the three-year-old conflict sparked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Poland and the Baltics are concerned that an end to the war in Ukraine could lead Russia to re-arm and target them instead. All four were under Moscow’s dominion during the Cold War.

“Poland’s hands cannot be tied,” Polish Deputy Prime Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz told a press conference.

GLOBAL DISARMAMENT

The 1997 Ottawa convention was one of a series of international agreements concluded after the end of the Cold War to encourage global disarmament. Anti-landmine campaigners won the Nobel Peace Prize that same year. Mines have killed or maimed tens of thousands of civilians across the globe, many of them long after conflicts have ended.

The International Committee of the Red Cross said it was “gravely concerned” by the move.

“Reintroducing these appalling weapons would be a deeply troubling step backward,” Cordula Droege, ICRC’s Chief Legal Officer, told Reuters. “Anti-personnel mines have limited military utility but devastating humanitarian consequences.”

Russia, the United States, China, India and Israel are among the countries who have not signed or ratified the treaty.

In 2008, the Convention on Cluster Munitions – explosive weapons that release smaller submunitions over a vast area – was adopted. Like landmines, they do not discriminate between combatants and civilians.

The United States, which did not sign that convention, in 2023 transferred cluster munitions to Ukraine to help it defend itself against Russia.

Also See: Macron Warns Russian Aggression ‘Knows No Borders’

FINLAND COULD FOLLOW

Other countries could follow the lead of Poland and the Baltics. Finland, the last EU state to sign the Ottawa convention, in 2012, has said it was mulling withdrawal, citing Russia’s use of such weapons in Ukraine as the reason. Finland shares a 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia.

“We have examined very closely through intelligence how Russia operates in Ukraine, specifically their mass use of infantry and also their mass use of mines,” Finnish Defence Minister Antti Hakkanen told Reuters in December.

“This infantry issue is one thing that argued for the fact that it’s worth examining the use of anti-personnel mines,” he said.

The Finnish parliament’s defence committee chair Jukka Kopra said on Tuesday the decision by Poland and the Baltics was “good and wise”.

Poland said it could withdraw from the convention by passing legislation in parliament and securing the president’s approval, followed by formal notification to the U.N. The withdrawal would take effect six months later.

In Estonia, the government needs to propose the law and parliament needs to vote on it, its foreign ministry said.

In Lithuania, the president will need to propose to parliament to denounce the convention, its foreign ministry said, and three-fifths of lawmakers need to support the move.

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

Since the Taliban’s return to power, Afghanistan has once again become a hub for militant activity despite their promises under the 2020 Doha Accord. UN and SIGAR reports reveal that Afghan soil now shelters TTP, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS-K operatives involved in cross-border attacks, particularly against Pakistan. The Taliban’s failure to uphold intra-Afghan dialogue, misuse of international aid, human rights abuses, and deception in regional agreements have eroded trust globally. With terror networks thriving under their protection, it is time for the U.S. and international community to adopt a new, accountable strategy toward Afghanistan’s Taliban regime.

Read More »
Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

The escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban-led regime have reignited South Asia’s most volatile frontier. As cross-border attacks intensify and the Taliban refuses to dismantle the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamabad faces mounting security and sovereignty challenges. Yet, amid this chaos, India emerges as the silent beneficiary, leveraging regional instability to weaken Pakistan strategically while maintaining its image as a victim of terrorism. This calculated exploitation threatens to entrench South Asia in a new cycle of proxy conflict.

Read More »
Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban break commitments, harbor terrorists, exclude women and minorities, and defy international agreements.

Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable

Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.

Read More »
The Istanbul dialogue between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban collapsed over the TTP issue, exposing the limits of regional diplomacy and mediation.

The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy

The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.

Read More »
Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.

Read More »