First US air strike on Taliban after the ceasefire ended

The US military says. That ended more than a week ago after an unusual ceasefire between the armed group and Afghan government forces. It has carried out its first airstrike against the Taliban.

No comment was made immediately after Friday\’s announcement. Col. Sonny Leggett, spokesman for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, said. An airstrike in the western province of Farah on Friday afternoon killed 25 Afghan fighters. Who attacked Afghan forces.

Hours earlier, the US air force struck an unknown number of Taliban in southern Kandahar province on Thursday night.
\”These were the first US airstrikes against (the Taliban) since the Eid ceasefire started,\” Leggett wrote. \”We reiterate: To allow the peace process to take hold, all sides must reduce violence,\” he added.

Leggett did not elaborate on the airstrikes or their motives. An Afghan government official, however, spoke on the condition of anonymity. Since he was not allowed to speak to the media, the Associated Press reported. Farah attacks killed three senior Taliban commanders and at least 13 other militants. News Agency.

On May 23, the Taliban announced a three-day surprise ceasefire with Afghan forces beginning the next day to coincide with Eid al-Fitr, the Muslim holiday that marks the end of Ramadan\’s fasting month.

The Kabul government welcomed the change and directed its troops to hold to the ceasefire.
There has since been an overall drop in violence across the world, with the Afghan government speeding up the release of hundreds of Taliban prisoners and saying it\’s ready to begin the long-delayed peace talks with the Taliban.
In February Washington signed a historic deal with the Taliban, promising to withdraw all US troops in exchange for security assurances.

Muhammed Saad

Muhammed Saad

Muhammed Saad, an author and independent researcher, focuses his inquiries on matters concerning regional affairs.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »